Mountain Uplift Physical Erosion and Weathering

Within the past decade much attention has been paid to the effect of mountain uplift on chemical weathering and its effect on the uptake of atmospheric CO2, an idea originally espoused by T.C. Chamberlin

(1899). The uplift of the Himalaya Mountains and resulting increased weathering has been cited as a principal cause of late Cenozoic cooling due to a drop in CO2 (Raymo, 1991). Orogenic uplift generally results in the development of high relief. High relief results in steep slopes and enhanced erosion, and enhanced erosion results in the constant uncovering of primary minerals and their exposure to the atmosphere. In the absence of steep slopes, a thick mantle of clay weathering product can accumulate and serve to protect the underlying primary minerals against further weathering. An excellent example of this situation is the thick clay-rich soils of the Amazon lowlands where little silicate weathering occurs (Stallard and Edmond, 1983). In addition, the development of mountain chains often leads to increased orographic rainfall and, at higher elevations, increased erosion by glaciers. All these factors should lead to more rapid silicate weathering and faster uptake of atmospheric CO2. Proof of this contention is the good global correlation of chemical weathering of silicates with physical erosion (Gaillardet et al., 1999).

The idea that past Himalayan uplift resulted in increased weathering on a global scale has been promoted by the study of strontium isotopes. Late Cenozoic seawater is notable for a sharp rise in the 87Sr/86Sr ratio as recorded by dated carbonate rocks. Principal sources of Sr to the ocean include input from rivers from continental weathering and deep ocean basalt-seawater reaction. Continental rocks are on the average higher in 87Sr/86Sr than are submarine basalts. Thus, it has been hypothesized that the increase in oceanic 87Sr/86Sr during the late Cenozoic was due to globally increased rates of weathering and input of strontium from the continents due to mountain uplift. Because most Sr occurs substituted for Ca in minerals, past Sr weathering fluxes presumably can be related to past Ca fluxes and rates of uptake of CO2 via the weathering of Ca silicates.

Quantitative estimates of the increase in silicate weathering rate due to Himalayan uplift have been made by Richter et al. (1992) based on the marine Sr isotopic record. However, changes in the 87Sr/86Sr value for the ocean can also be due to changes in the average 87Sr/86Sr of the rocks being weathered rather than due to changes in global weathering rate. This latter conclusion has been emphasized by a number of studies (e.g., Edmond, 1992; Blum et al., 1998; Galy et al., 1999). These studies found that the rocks of the high Himalayas are exceedingly radiogenic and that much of the radiogenic Sr, as well as Ca, in Himalayan rivers is derived from the weathering of carbonates, not silicates. Because carbonate weathering, as pointed out in the Introduction, does not lead to changes in CO2 on a multimillion-year time scale, the use of 87Sr/86Sr to deduce changes in weathering rates has fallen into general disfavor, along with the idea that the Himalayas played a role in bringing about a late Cenozoic drop in CO2 (e.g., Blum et al., 1998; Jacobson et al., 2003).

However, the Himalayas and other mountain chains still must have some importance to global weathering and the long-term carbon cycle. Once corrections for carbonate weathering are made, the chemical weathering rate of silicates can be deduced, and this has been done for two small Himalayan watersheds (West et al., 2002). West et al. found that in the high Himalayas silicate weathering is low and dominated by carbonate weathering, as found by the studies cited above, but in the Middle Hills and Ganges Basin silicate weathering is rapid and, on an areal basis, equivalent to other areas noted for their rapid silicate weathering rates. The high weathering rate is ascribed by West et al. to the input of fresh eroded material from the high Himalayas to the hot, wet, and heavily vegetated foothills. Perhaps the major role of high mountains at low latitudes, such as the Himalayas, is to provide abundant, physically eroded, fresh bedrock material to weathering at lower elevations.

Another area of the world where mountain uplift during the Miocene may have had a major effect on atmospheric CO2 due to enhanced weathering is the exhumation of the northern New Guinea arc terrain (Reusch and Maasch, 1998). The uplift of a volcanic arc to become a mountain belt would result in a change from net CO2 release to the atmosphere via volcanism to net uptake via weathering of the volcanics and associated sediments. Weathering in this area would have been accelerated by the warm, wet climate at that time (and at present). Basalts, the major volcanic rock type in this situation, would weather more rapidly than the more granitic composition of the Himalayas (see "Lithology and Weathering" in this chapter).

A more serious problem with strontium isotope modeling, as applied to the mountain uplift hypothesis for atmospheric CO2 control, has been ignoring mass balance in the carbon cycle. Raymo (1991) and Richter et al. (1992), based on Sr isotope modeling, call for an increase in rates of CO2 uptake by silicate weathering during a period when there was no known increase in rates of CO2 supply to the atmosphere by volca-nic/metamorphic degassing. As pointed out by Kump and Arthur (1997) and Berner and Caldeira (1997), because there is so little CO2 in the atmosphere (and oceans with which it exchanges carbon), an excess of atmospheric output over input leads to a rapid drop of CO2 to zero in less than a million years. If mountain uplift leads to increased atmospheric CO2 uptake, with no accompanying increased input to the atmosphere from volcanism, then another counterbalancing process with decreased uptake is necessary. The simplest counterbalance is a deceleration globally of weathering due to lower temperatures accompanying lower CO2 levels. In this way the actual rate of CO2 uptake by weathering does not change; it is controlled by the rate of emission of CO2 to the atmosphere. Instead, acceleration due to uplift is balanced by deceleration due to global cooling, and atmospheric carbon mass balance is maintained (Berner, 1991,1994; Kump and Arthur, 1997;

Francois and Godderis, 1998). In this way the atmospheric greenhouse effect (see next section) serves as a negative feedback for stabilizing CO2 and climate against possibly large perturbations such as mountain uplift.

Nonetheless, it is still possible to use strontium isotope in a long-term carbon cycle model. One approach (Berner and Rye, 1992) is to ensure carbon mass balance while letting the variation of 87Sr/86Sr be due to changes in the relative proportions of granite (high 87Sr/86Sr) weathering versus basalt (low 87Sr/86Sr) weathering on the continents. In this case variations in oceanic 87Sr/86Sr do not represent changes in anything other than the source of the strontium. This approach has been suggested recently by studies that emphasize the quantitative importance of basalt weathering over time (Dessert et al., 2003).

Another approach is to assume that the 87Sr/86Sr of rocks undergoing weathering on the continents varies with time without specifying the rock types and that higher 87Sr/86Sr implies faster weathering. The idea is that old, highly radiogenic rocks are characteristic of the cores of oro-genic mountain belts and that the highly radiogenic signature is a sign of increased weathering due to mountain uplift and the exposure of the old radiogenic rocks to weathering. In this way there is a loose connection between the Sr cycle and the C cycle without imbalances in either. I adopted this approach (Berner, 1994) in terms of an adjustable correlation parameter between 87Sr/86Sr and the acceleration of weathering. The appropriate expression derived in that study is:

fR(t) = 1 - L [(Rocb(t) - Rocm(t))/(Rocb(t) - 0.700)] (2.1)

where fR(t) = dimensionless parameter expressing the effect of mountain uplift on CO2 uptake by the weathering of Ca and Mg silicates

Rocm(t) = measured 87Sr/86Sr value of the oceans as recorded by limestones

Rocb(t) = calculated 87Sr/86Sr value for the oceans for submarine basalt-seawater reaction alone L = adjustable empirical parameter expressing the effect of 87Sr/86Sr on weathering rate.

The values of Rocb(t) were calculated from changes in the rates of basalt-seawater reaction assuming that they directly follow changes in rates of seafloor production (for a detailed discussion of seafloor production and spreading rate, see chapter 4). Excess values of measured 87Sr/86Sr over the calculated Rocb(t) values are assumed in equation (2-1) to reflect increased input of radiogenic Sr from the continents. The parameter L is varied in the GEOCARB carbon cycle model (Berner, 1994) to investigate sensitivity of Sr isotope variation to calculated atmospheric CO2 level.

A more direct approach to mountain uplift and weathering is to estimate actual rates of continental erosion over geologic time. This has been done recently and incorporated into long-term carbon cycle models (Berner and Kothavala, 2001; Wallmann, 2001). A direct measure of global erosion in the geological past is the global rate by which silic-iclastic rocks (sandstones and shales) were deposited. Such rocks, by definition, are derived by physical erosion. The abundance of sandstones plus shales over the Phanerozoic has been estimated from studies of thousands of rock occurrences by Ronov (1993). The data, listed for ages going back every 10-30 million years, has been fitted with an exponential decay relation representing, as a first-order approximation, the loss of the rocks as a result of their own erosion (Wold and Hay, 1990). The proper expression for this is:

where t = mean age of a given volume of rocks deposited over the time span At AV = volume of rocks of age span At (AV/At)o = rate of deposition at "present"

k = erosion decay coefficient (assumed constant).

Values of AV/At are determined from the data of Ronov (1993) for 27 age spans ranging from the Miocene to the lower Cambrian. A plot fitted to the Ronov data is shown in figure 2.1. To avoid overly biasing the fitted curve by including excessive erosion accompanying the Plio-Pleistocene glaciation, "present" is assumed to represent the mid-Miocene (15 Ma). Also, use of a constant value for k assumes that the probability of erosive loss does not change with time. Deviations of each time span data point above and below the exponential curve can then be interpreted as original increases or decreases in global sedimentation (i.e., erosion) rate relative to that at present (Wold and Hay, 1990). In other words,

where Rdepn(t) = rate of deposition at time t, and the subscripts ron and exp refer, respectively, to the measured values of Ronov and the expected values for each time for simple exponential decay. The symbol (o) refers to the Miocene present. This expression can be recast in terms of a dimensionless parameter:

Global Erosion Rates
Figure 2.1. Exponential fit to the data of Ronov (1993) for the volume of sandstones and shales per unit time plotted against geological age. (Modified from Berner and Kothavala, 2001.)

Finally, based on the findings of a log-log linear relation between physical erosion rate and silicate weathering rate for the world's major rivers (Gaillardet et al., 1999), one can express the relative effect of mountain uplift and erosion on the rate of chemical weathering of Ca and Mg silicates as the dimensionless parameter:

Equation (2.5) is another derivation for the parameter fR(t) (see equation 2.1). A cubic fit to values of fR(t) over Phanerozoic time is shown in figure 2.2. Included also in figure 2.2 are the results for fR(t) calculated from strontium isotopes via equation (2.1) using L = 2. It is interesting that isotope-based fR(t) values are in very good agreement with the curve fit to the sediment data. This agreement between two independent methods suggests that the use of Sr isotopes to describe the effect of mountain uplift on silicate chemical weathering has some validity.

Organic Gardening

Organic Gardening

Gardening is also a great way to provide healthy food for you and your loved ones. When you buy produce from the store, it just isnt the same as presenting a salad to your family that came exclusively from your garden worked by your own two hands.

Get My Free Ebook


  • Julia
    What is carbon uplift?
    8 years ago
  • gorbulas
    How does uplift affect the carbon cycle?
    8 years ago
  • taziana
    How does erosion/weathering cause the carbon cycle?
    8 years ago
  • marco
    How does uplift and erosion connect to carbon cycle?
    8 years ago
  • jana m
    What is the role of uplift in the carbon cycle?
    7 years ago
  • antje
    Do periods of uplift/ mountain building and weathering interact with climate?
    6 years ago
  • negassi asfaha
    How are weathering, erosion, uplift related?
    6 years ago
  • nicla
    What does weather and erosion do in carbon cycel?
    5 years ago
  • maddison fleming
    What is uplifting in the carbon?
    5 years ago
  • darragh
    How do uplift weathering remove co2?
    4 years ago
  • robert delacruz
    How do uplift and erosion relate?
    4 years ago
  • semere
    Why is sedimentary rock more common on the surface?
    3 years ago
  • Kinfe
    How did the uplift of the Himalayan mountains affect Earth's climate?
    3 years ago
  • damiana
    How does wethering effect the himalayan mountains?
    2 years ago
  • MACY
    How does uplifting and erosion affect the himalayas?
    2 years ago
  • pentti
    How uplift effects mountains?
    20 days ago

Post a comment