By Jeffrey D Sachs

Power Efficiency Guide

Ultimate Guide to Power Efficiency

Get Instant Access

Encouraging lower fertility in the developing world will pay off for everyone.

124 Anti Gravity by steve mirsky

126 Ask the Experts

How do batteries store and discharge electricity? Does damp weather make arthritis pain worse?

Cover image by Phil Saunders, Space Channel Ltd.; photograph at left by Honda Motor Company.

Scientific American (ISSN 0036-8733), published monthly by Scientific American, Inc., 415 Madison Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017-1111. Copyright © 2006 by Scientific American, Inc. All rights reserved. No part of this issue may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording for public or private use, or by any information storage or retrieval system, without the prior written permission of the publisher. Periodicals postage paid at New York, N.Y., and at additional mailing offices. Canada Post International Publications Mail (Canadian Distribution) Sales Agreement No. 40012504. Canadian BN No. 127387652RT; QST No. Q1015332537. Publication Mail Agreement #40012504. Return undeliverable mail to Scientific American, P.O. Box 819, Stn Main, Markham, ON L3P 8A2. Subscription rates: one year $34.97, Canada $49 USD, International $55 USD. Postmaster: Send address changes to Scientific American, Box 3187, Harlan, Iowa 51537. Reprints available: write Reprint Department, Scientific American, Inc., 415 Madison Avenue, New York, N.Y. 10017-1111; (212) 451-8877; Q B fax: (212) 355-0408. Subscription inquiries: u.S. and Canada (800) 333-1199; other (515) 248-7684. Send e-mail to [email protected] Printed in U.S.A. Wi

—ISA Perspectives

Cooling Our Heels

From Christmas Day in 1991, when the white, blue and red Russian flag rose over the Kremlin, symbolizing the end of the Soviet Union, the U.S. assumed a dominant presence in world affairs the likes of which has not been witnessed since the Imperium Romanum. Yet the nation that endorsed the idea of preemptive military action has acted with remarkable passivity when it comes to an energy policy that deals with climate change.

In a recent scholarly article, economist Jeffrey D. Sachs and geo-physicist Klaus S. Lackner of Columbia University noted that the Bush administration's impulse on global warming has been to wait for "something to turn up"—say, the discovery of a plentiful, noncarbon fuel or a technique to eliminate greenhouse emissions at low cost. Global warming has never been the priority it should be.

The reasons are not hard to fathom. People worry that the consumerist way of life that Americans have come to accept as a birthright will have to be scaled back. After all, on average, each U.S. citizen has more than twice the energy consumption of a western European, according to statistics for 2003, and almost 10 times that of a Chinese. To narrow this gap, the U.S. will have to alter its energy-intensive habits. But that doesn't mean we must all live in cardboard boxes. In every plan to tackle warming, Americans will still be better off in 2050 than they are today.

Both technical and policy farsightedness will be

DARK SHADOW: U.S. leadership void impairs progress on climate change.

needed to achieve the concurrent objectives of growth and sustainability. Decades may pass before hydrogen-powered trucks and cars relegate gasoline-and diesel-fueled vehicles to antique auto shows. In the interim, conservation and better efficiencies in both transportation and electricity generation and usage will allow us to muddle through. Yet for even that to happen, the world's leading economy—and emitter of almost one quarter of human-generated carbon emissions—will have to assume the leadership role that it has so far largely shirked.

Regaining a modicum of credibility will itself prove an immense undertaking. Both the president and Congress need to endorse the ever expanding body of evidence that points to the reality of warming and listen to, rather than harass, scientists who arrive bearing bad news.

Funding for energy research must be accorded the privileged status usually reserved for health care and defense. Yet rhetoric needs to go beyond the mantra that before taking action, more research is needed to eliminate uncertainties surrounding climate science. A ceiling on greenhouse emissions should be set, and then the market should decide how to achieve that target through sales and purchases of emissions allowances. Other measures that must be adopted include stiffened fuel economy standards, carbon taxes and requirements that the largest producers of greenhouse gases report their emissions publicly.

The U.S. should lead by example. An aggressive domestic program would enable this country to influence China, India and other fast-growing developing nations to control emissions. Without the U. S. at the head of the table, the prospects for any meaningful action on a global scale will gradually recede along with the Arctic glaciers.

THE EDITORS [email protected]

IHow to Contact Us

EDITORIAL For Letters to the Editors:

Letters to the Editors Scientific American 415 Madison Ave. New York, NY 10017-1111

[email protected] Please include your name and mailing address, and cite the article and the issue in which it appeared. Letters may be edited for length and clarity. We regret that we cannot answer all correspondence. For general inquiries: Scientific American 415 Madison Ave. New York, NY 10017-1111 212-451-8200 fax: 212-755-1976 or

[email protected]

SUBSCRIPTIONS For new subscriptions, renewals, gifts, payments, and changes ofaddress:

U.S. and Canada 800-333-1199 Outside North America 515-248-7684

Scientific American Box 3187 Harlan, IA 51537

REPRINTS To order reprints of articles:

Reprint Department Scientific American 415 Madison Ave. New York, NY 10017-1111 212-451-8877 fax: 212-355-0408 [email protected]

PERMISSIONS For permission to copy or reuse material from SA: /permissions

212-451-8546 for procedures or

Permissions Department Scientific American 415 Madison Ave. New York, NY 10017-1111 Please allow three to six weeks for processing.

ADVERTISING has electronic contact information for sales representatives of Scientific American in all regions of the U.S. and in other countries. New York

Scientific American

415 Madison Ave.

New York, NY 10017-1111


fax: 212-754-1138

Los Angeles


fax: 310-234-2670

San Francisco


fax: 415-437-2892


Karen Teegarden & Associates


fax: 248-642-6138


Derr Media Group 847-615-1921 fax: 847-735-1457 Southeast and Southwest Publicitas North America, Inc. 972-386-6186 fax: 972-233-9819 Direct Response

Special Aditions Advertising, LLC


fax: 914-461-3433


IMR Pty Ltd.

Tel: +612-8850-2220

Fax: +612-8850-0454


Publicitas Media S.A. +32-(0)2-639-8420 fax: +32-(0)2-639-8430 Canada

Derr Media Group 847-615-1921 fax: 847-735-1457 France and Switzerland PEM-PEMA +33-1-46-37-2117 fax: +33-1-47-38-6329 Germany

Publicitas Germany GmbH +49-211-862-092-0 fax: +49-211-862-092-21 Hong Kong

Hutton Media Limited + 852-2528-9135 fax: +852-2528-9281 India

Convergence Media +91-22-2414-4808 fax: +91-22-2414-5594 Japan

Pacific Business, Inc. +813-3661-6138 fax: +813-3661-6139 Korea

Biscom, Inc. + 822-739-7840 fax: +822-732-3662 Middle East

Peter Smith Media & Marketing


fax: +44-140-484-1320

The Netherlands

Insight Publicitas BV


fax: +31-35-531-0572

Scandinavia and Finland

M&M International Media AB

The Powers Turner Group +44-207-592-8331 fax: +44-207-630-9922

1Onthe Web


Was this article helpful?

0 0
Solar Stirling Engine Basics Explained

Solar Stirling Engine Basics Explained

The solar Stirling engine is progressively becoming a viable alternative to solar panels for its higher efficiency. Stirling engines might be the best way to harvest the power provided by the sun. This is an easy-to-understand explanation of how Stirling engines work, the different types, and why they are more efficient than steam engines.

Get My Free Ebook

Post a comment